MH vs TRI: stock comparison and AI forecast
Mcgraw Hill, Inc. (MH) and Thomson Reuters Corp /Can/ (TRI) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
MH Mcgraw Hill, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $2.15B
- P/E Ratio
- 160.4x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp /Can/
- Price
- $118.11 +26.5% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $53.01B
- P/E Ratio
- 11.0x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- TRI is 24.7 times larger than MH by market capitalization ($53.01B against $2.15B).
- TRI trades at 11.0 times trailing earnings, MH at 160.4 times.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Miscellaneous Publishing.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | MH | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $53.01B |
| P/E Ratio | 160.43x | 10.97x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.45x | – |
| EPS | $0.07 | $10.77 |
| Book Value/Share | $4.58 | – |
| Revenue/Share | $10.87 | $40.68 |
| FCF/Share | $1.34 | $11.15 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | MH | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| ROA | – | 27.1% |
| ROIC | 6.5% | 35.2% |
| Gross Margin | 81.7% | – |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 27.9% |
| Net Margin | – | 26.6% |
| EBT Margin | 4.0% | – |
| Tax Rate | 11.8% | – |
Financial Health
| Metric | MH | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.86x | 0.64x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.74x | 0.64x |
| D/E Ratio | 5.51x | – |
| Financial Leverage | 6.51x | – |
| Interest Coverage | 1.7x | – |
| Working Capital | -$200M | -$1.24B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | MH | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $353M | $6.56B |
| Free Cash Flow | $256M | $5.00B |
| Capital Spending | -$97M | -$1.56B |
| OCF Growth YoY | – | 21.8% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | 0.0% |
| FCF/Sales | 12.3% | 27.4% |
| CapEx/Sales | 4.7% | 8.5% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | MH | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.36x | 1.02x |
| Receivables Turnover | 3.2x | – |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.4x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 22.1x | 50.6x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 113 days | – |
| Days Inventory | 153 days | – |
| Payables Period | 111 days | – |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 154 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | MH | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $2.08B | $18.26B |
| Operating Income | $279M | $5.09B |
| Net Income | – | $4.87B |
| R&D Expense | $270M | – |
| SG&A Expense | $930M | – |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $381M | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | MH | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 191M | 449M |
| Net Income Growth | – | 1.1% |
| EPS Growth | – | 5.5% |
MH vs TRI: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, MH or TRI?
TRI is 24.7 times larger than MH by market capitalization ($53.01B against $2.15B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, MH or TRI?
TRI trades at 11.0 times trailing earnings, MH at 160.4 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, MH or TRI?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.