LMB vs RUN: stock comparison and AI forecast
Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Sunrun Inc. (RUN) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $650M
- P/E Ratio
- 20.6x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
RUN Sunrun Inc.
- Market Cap
- $2.38B
- P/E Ratio
- 6.3x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- RUN is 3.7 times larger than LMB by market capitalization ($2.38B against $650M).
- RUN trades at 6.3 times trailing earnings, LMB at 20.6 times.
- RUN turns 14.0% of its revenue into net income, against 4.2% for LMB.
- RUN carries 5.03 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.77 times for LMB.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Construction - Special Trade Contractors.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | LMB | RUN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $650M | $2.38B |
| P/E Ratio | 20.57x | 6.33x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.18x | 0.64x |
| EPS | $2.65 | $1.56 |
| Book Value/Share | $17.14 | $15.33 |
| Revenue/Share | $61.19 | $15.99 |
| FCF/Share | $4.80 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | LMB | RUN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.1% | 14.6% |
| ROA | 5.5% | 2.2% |
| ROIC | 11.1% | 1.1% |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | – |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 6.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 14.0% |
| EBT Margin | 5.3% | -15.5% |
| Tax Rate | 19.6% | 0.3% |
Financial Health
| Metric | LMB | RUN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.54x | 1.52x |
| Quick Ratio | – | 1.05x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.77x | 5.03x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.77x | 6.49x |
| Interest Coverage | 18.5x | 0.7x |
| Working Capital | $105M | $786M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | LMB | RUN |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $59M | $223M |
| Free Cash Flow | $57M | – |
| Capital Spending | -$2M | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | 60.9% | – |
| FCF Growth YoY | 79.2% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 7.8% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 0.3% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | LMB | RUN |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.29x | 0.16x |
| Receivables Turnover | 3.9x | 13.3x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 30.2x | 69.4x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 95 days | 27 days |
| Payables Period | 64 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | LMB | RUN |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $730M | $3.85B |
| Operating Income | $41M | $242M |
| Net Income | $31M | $540M |
| R&D Expense | – | $39M |
| SG&A Expense | $119M | $1.36B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $559M | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | LMB | RUN |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 12M | 241M |
| Net Income Growth | -15.7% | – |
| EPS Growth | -6.0% | – |
LMB vs RUN: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, LMB or RUN?
RUN is 3.7 times larger than LMB by market capitalization ($2.38B against $650M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, LMB or RUN?
RUN trades at 6.3 times trailing earnings, LMB at 20.6 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, LMB or RUN?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.