HL vs SQM: stock comparison and AI forecast
Hecla Mining Co/De/ (HL) and Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile Inc (SQM) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
HL Hecla Mining Co/De/
- Price
- $14.45 -20.0% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $9.71B
- P/E Ratio
- 25.8x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
SQM Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile Inc
- Price
- $56.36 -38.5% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $16.10B
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- SQM is 1.7 times larger than HL by market capitalization ($16.10B against $9.71B).
- Over the last six months HL returned -20.0% and SQM -38.5%.
- HL yields 0.11% in dividends; SQM pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels).
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | HL | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.71B | $16.10B |
| P/E Ratio | 25.80x | – |
| P/B Ratio | 4.91x | – |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | – |
| EPS | $0.56 | – |
| Book Value/Share | $2.95 | – |
| Revenue/Share | $2.36 | – |
| FCF/Share | $0.86 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | HL | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 51.4% | – |
| Operating Margin | 95.7% | – |
| EBT Margin | 93.8% | – |
| Tax Rate | 22.5% | – |
Financial Health
| Metric | HL | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.96x | – |
| Quick Ratio | 5.82x | – |
| D/E Ratio | 0.48x | – |
| Interest Coverage | 253.5x | – |
| Working Capital | $876M | – |
Cash Flow
| Metric | HL | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $789M | – |
| Free Cash Flow | $577M | – |
| Capital Spending | -$212M | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | 91.1% | – |
| FCF Growth YoY | 216.5% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 36.3% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 13.4% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | HL | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Receivables Turnover | 11.8x | – |
| Inventory Turnover | 32.4x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 0.7x | – |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 31 days | – |
| Days Inventory | 11 days | – |
| Payables Period | 39 days | – |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 3 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | HL | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $1.59B | – |
| Operating Income | $746M | – |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $772M | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | HL | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.02 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 3.6% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 672M | 286M |
| EPS Growth | 166.7% | – |
HL vs SQM: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, HL or SQM?
SQM is 1.7 times larger than HL by market capitalization ($16.10B against $9.71B).
Which stock performed better over the last six months, HL or SQM?
Over the last six months HL returned -20.0% and SQM -38.5%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, HL or SQM?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.