DORM vs GTX: stock comparison and AI forecast
Dorman Products, Inc. (DORM) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
DORM Dorman Products, Inc.
- Price
- $139.48 +12.0% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $4.11B
- P/E Ratio
- 20.8x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.
- Price
- $19.36 -28.4% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $3.57B
- P/E Ratio
- 8.9x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- DORM is 1.2 times larger than GTX by market capitalization ($4.11B against $3.57B).
- GTX trades at 8.9 times trailing earnings, DORM at 20.8 times.
- Over the last six months DORM returned +12.0% and GTX -28.4%.
- GTX turns 10.0% of its revenue into net income, against 9.3% for DORM.
- GTX yields 1.73% in dividends; DORM pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | DORM | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.11B | $3.57B |
| P/E Ratio | 20.76x | 8.88x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.63x | – |
| Dividend Yield | – | 1.73% |
| EPS | $6.72 | $2.18 |
| Book Value/Share | $53.06 | – |
| Revenue/Share | $73.68 | $20.49 |
| FCF/Share | $9.13 | $2.14 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | DORM | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.9% | – |
| ROA | 7.9% | 14.9% |
| ROIC | 13.7% | – |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | 21.1% |
| Operating Margin | 13.3% | – |
| Net Margin | 9.3% | 10.0% |
| EBT Margin | 12.6% | 12.3% |
| Tax Rate | 26.2% | 19.1% |
Financial Health
| Metric | DORM | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.65x | 1.04x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.88x | 0.78x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.64x | – |
| Financial Leverage | 1.64x | – |
| Interest Coverage | 7.7x | – |
| Working Capital | $1.18B | $58M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | DORM | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $303M | $477M |
| Free Cash Flow | $269M | $395M |
| Capital Spending | -$33M | -$82M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 111.0% | 7.2% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 155.4% | 6.2% |
| FCF/Sales | 12.4% | 10.4% |
| CapEx/Sales | 1.5% | 2.2% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | DORM | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.85x | 1.49x |
| Receivables Turnover | 3.5x | – |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.6x | 7.7x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 13.1x | 9.0x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 106 days | – |
| Days Inventory | 224 days | 47 days |
| Payables Period | 51 days | 135 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 279 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | DORM | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $2.17B | $3.78B |
| Operating Income | $289M | – |
| Net Income | $202M | $377M |
| SG&A Expense | $546M | $244M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $1.28B | $2.98B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | DORM | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $0.34 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 15.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | 29M | 185M |
| Net Income Growth | -18.2% | 15.6% |
| EPS Growth | -16.2% | 55.7% |
DORM vs GTX: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, DORM or GTX?
DORM is 1.2 times larger than GTX by market capitalization ($4.11B against $3.57B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, DORM or GTX?
GTX trades at 8.9 times trailing earnings, DORM at 20.8 times.
Which stock performed better over the last six months, DORM or GTX?
Over the last six months DORM returned +12.0% and GTX -28.4%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, DORM or GTX?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.