CXM vs PRGS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Progress Software Corp /Ma (PRGS) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
CXM Sprinklr, Inc.
- Price
- $6.84 +25.5% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $1.63B
- P/E Ratio
- 136.8x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
PRGS Progress Software Corp /Ma
- Market Cap
- $1.82B
- P/E Ratio
- 19.7x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- PRGS is 1.1 times larger than CXM by market capitalization ($1.82B against $1.63B).
- PRGS trades at 19.6 times trailing earnings, CXM at 136.8 times.
- PRGS turns 9.2% of its revenue into net income, against 2.0% for CXM.
- PRGS carries 3.34 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.02 times for CXM.
- PRGS yields 0.07% in dividends; CXM pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Services-Prepackaged Software.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | CXM | PRGS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.63B | $1.82B |
| P/E Ratio | 136.80x | 19.65x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.13x | 3.44x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 0.07% |
| EPS | $0.05 | $2.27 |
| Book Value/Share | $2.18 | $12.97 |
| Revenue/Share | – | $24.46 |
| FCF/Share | – | $7.81 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | CXM | PRGS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.3% | 17.4% |
| ROA | 1.6% | 4.0% |
| ROIC | 8.4% | 9.3% |
| Gross Margin | 65.7% | 82.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 17.7% |
| Net Margin | 2.0% | 9.2% |
| EBT Margin | 8.0% | 11.1% |
| Tax Rate | 61.7% | 16.7% |
Financial Health
| Metric | CXM | PRGS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.56x | 0.80x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.02x | 3.34x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.02x | 4.34x |
| Interest Coverage | – | 4.0x |
| Working Capital | $264M | -$85M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | CXM | PRGS |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $143M | $328M |
| Free Cash Flow | – | $319M |
| Capital Spending | – | -$9M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 19.8% | 70.9% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | 71.3% |
| FCF/Sales | – | 31.9% |
| CapEx/Sales | – | 0.9% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | CXM | PRGS |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | – | 0.43x |
| Receivables Turnover | – | 8.4x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | – | 65.5x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | – | 43 days |
| Payables Period | 37 days | 21 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | CXM | PRGS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | – | $1000M |
| Operating Income | $48M | $177M |
| Net Income | $17M | $92M |
| R&D Expense | $96M | $195M |
| SG&A Expense | $678M | $485M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $292M | $178M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | CXM | PRGS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $0.03 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 1.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | 238M | 41M |
| Net Income Growth | -85.8% | 90.4% |
| EPS Growth | -87.2% | 70.7% |
CXM vs PRGS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, CXM or PRGS?
PRGS is 1.1 times larger than CXM by market capitalization ($1.82B against $1.63B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, CXM or PRGS?
PRGS trades at 19.6 times trailing earnings, CXM at 136.8 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, CXM or PRGS?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.