CVE vs FANG: stock comparison and AI forecast
Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
CVE Cenovus Energy Inc.
- Market Cap
- $52.00B
- P/E Ratio
- 7.8x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.
- Price
- $179.58 -5.7% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $50.29B
- P/E Ratio
- 24.2x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- CVE and FANG have similar market capitalizations ($52.00B and $50.29B).
- CVE trades at 7.8 times trailing earnings, FANG at 24.2 times.
- FANG turns 11.0% of its revenue into net income, against 7.0% for CVE.
- CVE carries 1.01 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.69 times for FANG.
- FANG yields 2.38% in dividends; CVE pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | CVE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $52.00B | $50.29B |
| P/E Ratio | 7.77x | 24.20x |
| P/B Ratio | – | 1.29x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 2.38% |
| EPS | $3.55 | $7.42 |
| Book Value/Share | – | $139.15 |
| Revenue/Share | $50.01 | $66.45 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | CVE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 29.0% | 5.3% |
| ROA | 14.5% | 2.9% |
| ROIC | – | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | – | 12.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 11.0% |
| EBT Margin | 8.3% | 14.8% |
| Tax Rate | 15.6% | 19.9% |
Financial Health
| Metric | CVE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.57x | 0.55x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.04x | 0.54x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.01x | 0.69x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.01x | 1.85x |
| Interest Coverage | – | 32.9x |
| Working Capital | $2.61B | -$2.59B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | CVE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $15.82B | $10.36B |
| OCF Growth YoY | -10.0% | 18.3% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | CVE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 2.07x | 0.26x |
| Receivables Turnover | 38.3x | 8.8x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 2.9x | 0.3x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 10 days | 42 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | CVE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $94.18B | $18.61B |
| Operating Income | – | $2.35B |
| Net Income | $6.58B | $2.05B |
| SG&A Expense | – | $312M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | CVE | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $4.28 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 57.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | 1883M | 280M |
| Net Income Growth | -38.2% | -51.1% |
| EPS Growth | -33.7% | -47.5% |
CVE vs FANG: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, CVE or FANG?
CVE and FANG have similar market capitalizations ($52.00B and $50.29B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, CVE or FANG?
CVE trades at 7.8 times trailing earnings, FANG at 24.2 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, CVE or FANG?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.