CRCT vs NANO: stock comparison and AI forecast
Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) and Forge Nano Holdings, Inc. (NANO) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
CRCT Cricut, Inc.
- Price
- $9.25 +112.2% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $1.94B
- P/E Ratio
- 24.3x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
NANO Forge Nano Holdings, Inc.
- Price
- $4.06 -62.9% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $607M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- CRCT is 3.2 times larger than NANO by market capitalization ($1.94B against $607M).
- Over the last six months CRCT returned +112.2% and NANO -62.9%.
- CRCT yields 4.36% in dividends; NANO pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Special Industry Machinery, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | CRCT | NANO |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.94B | $607M |
| P/E Ratio | 24.34x | – |
| P/B Ratio | 4.85x | – |
| Dividend Yield | 4.36% | – |
| EPS | $0.38 | – |
| Book Value/Share | $1.91 | – |
| Revenue/Share | $3.38 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | CRCT | NANO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 23.8% | – |
| ROA | 14.6% | – |
| ROIC | 28.4% | – |
| Gross Margin | 58.5% | – |
| Operating Margin | 16.7% | – |
| Net Margin | 13.4% | – |
| EBT Margin | 18.0% | – |
| Tax Rate | 25.5% | – |
Financial Health
| Metric | CRCT | NANO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.40x | – |
| Quick Ratio | 1.75x | – |
| D/E Ratio | 0.63x | – |
| Financial Leverage | 1.63x | – |
| Interest Coverage | 24.6x | – |
| Working Capital | $328M | – |
Cash Flow
| Metric | CRCT | NANO |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $183M | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | -17.0% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | CRCT | NANO |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.09x | – |
| Receivables Turnover | 6.7x | – |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.9x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 13.6x | – |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 54 days | – |
| Days Inventory | 188 days | – |
| Payables Period | 127 days | – |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 116 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | CRCT | NANO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $708M | – |
| Operating Income | $118M | – |
| Net Income | $95M | – |
| R&D Expense | $68M | – |
| SG&A Expense | $261M | – |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $294M | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | CRCT | NANO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.40 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 105.3% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 209M | 150M |
| Net Income Growth | 17.5% | – |
| EPS Growth | 11.8% | – |
CRCT vs NANO: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, CRCT or NANO?
CRCT is 3.2 times larger than NANO by market capitalization ($1.94B against $607M).
Which stock performed better over the last six months, CRCT or NANO?
Over the last six months CRCT returned +112.2% and NANO -62.9%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, CRCT or NANO?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.