COO vs WRBY: stock comparison and AI forecast
Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) and Warby Parker Inc. (WRBY) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
COO Cooper Companies, Inc.
- Price
- $63.51 +3.9% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $12.08B
- P/E Ratio
- 17.5x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
WRBY Warby Parker Inc.
- Price
- $26.08 +18.4% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $3.23B
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- COO is 3.7 times larger than WRBY by market capitalization ($12.08B against $3.23B).
- Over the last six months WRBY returned +18.4% and COO +3.9%.
- COO turns 13.5% of its revenue into net income, against 1.6% for WRBY.
- WRBY carries 0.93 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.52 times for COO.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Ophthalmic Goods.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | COO | WRBY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.08B | $3.23B |
| P/E Ratio | 17.54x | – |
| P/B Ratio | 1.45x | 9.11x |
| EPS | $3.62 | $0.00 |
| Book Value/Share | $43.80 | $2.86 |
| Revenue/Share | $22.28 | $7.56 |
| FCF/Share | $3.57 | $0.17 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | COO | WRBY |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.8% | 3.9% |
| ROA | 4.5% | – |
| ROIC | 5.0% | – |
| Gross Margin | 65.9% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | 12.8% | 0.2% |
| Net Margin | 13.5% | 1.6% |
| EBT Margin | 10.9% | 1.1% |
| Tax Rate | -23.3% | 27.6% |
Financial Health
| Metric | COO | WRBY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.22x | 2.26x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.73x | 1.97x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.52x | 0.93x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.52x | – |
| Interest Coverage | 1.2x | 45.6x |
| Working Capital | $415M | $204M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | COO | WRBY |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $1.03B | $102M |
| Free Cash Flow | $678M | $21M |
| Capital Spending | -$355M | -$81M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 26.6% | -5.0% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 64.6% | -43.7% |
| FCF/Sales | 16.0% | 2.3% |
| CapEx/Sales | 8.4% | 8.7% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | COO | WRBY |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.33x | – |
| Receivables Turnover | 5.4x | 438.4x |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.6x | 9.1x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 2.0x | 4.4x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 68 days | 1 days |
| Days Inventory | 230 days | 40 days |
| Payables Period | 64 days | 25 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 235 days | 16 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | COO | WRBY |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $4.24B | $935M |
| Operating Income | $544M | $2M |
| Net Income | $570M | $14M |
| R&D Expense | $170M | – |
| SG&A Expense | $1.89B | $510M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $1.44B | $423M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | COO | WRBY |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 190M | 124M |
| Net Income Growth | 39.9% | 292.4% |
| EPS Growth | 87.6% | – |
COO vs WRBY: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, COO or WRBY?
COO is 3.7 times larger than WRBY by market capitalization ($12.08B against $3.23B).
Which stock performed better over the last six months, COO or WRBY?
Over the last six months WRBY returned +18.4% and COO +3.9%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, COO or WRBY?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.