ATO vs LNG: stock comparison and AI forecast
Atmos Energy Corp (ATO) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
ATO Atmos Energy Corp
- Market Cap
- $29.57B
- P/E Ratio
- 20.9x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $57.09B
- P/E Ratio
- 19.9x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- LNG is 1.9 times larger than ATO by market capitalization ($57.09B against $29.57B).
- LNG trades at 19.9 times trailing earnings, ATO at 20.9 times.
- ATO turns 28.5% of its revenue into net income, against 22.0% for LNG.
- LNG carries 5.93 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.07 times for ATO.
- ATO yields 2.14% in dividends and LNG 0.82%.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Natural Gas Distribution.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | ATO | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $29.57B | $57.09B |
| P/E Ratio | 20.88x | 19.86x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.94x | 10.02x |
| Dividend Yield | 2.14% | 0.82% |
| EPS | $8.38 | $14.08 |
| Book Value/Share | $90.29 | $27.91 |
| Revenue/Share | $29.12 | $113.72 |
| FCF/Share | $-11.96 | $18.55 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | ATO | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.2% | 68.6% |
| ROA | 4.4% | – |
| ROIC | 6.1% | – |
| Gross Margin | – | 9.6% |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | 36.8% |
| Net Margin | 28.5% | 22.0% |
| EBT Margin | 35.6% | 30.9% |
| Tax Rate | 20.0% | 15.2% |
Financial Health
| Metric | ATO | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.81x | 0.90x |
| Quick Ratio | – | 0.76x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.07x | 5.93x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.07x | – |
| Interest Coverage | 1.4x | 6.7x |
| Working Capital | -$344M | -$523M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | ATO | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $2.02B | $7.18B |
| Free Cash Flow | -$2.02B | $3.79B |
| Capital Spending | -$4.04B | -$3.39B |
| OCF Growth YoY | -0.6% | 40.1% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | 70.4% |
| FCF/Sales | -41.0% | 16.3% |
| CapEx/Sales | 82.1% | 14.6% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | ATO | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.16x | – |
| Receivables Turnover | 10.5x | 16.7x |
| Inventory Turnover | – | 29.1x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | – | 0.6x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 35 days | 22 days |
| Days Inventory | – | 13 days |
| Payables Period | – | 7 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 27 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | ATO | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $4.92B | $23.22B |
| Operating Income | $1.82B | $6.52B |
| Net Income | $1.40B | $3.91B |
| SG&A Expense | – | $423M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | – | $20.99B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | ATO | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $3.74 | $2.28 |
| Payout Ratio | 44.6% | 16.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | 169M | 204M |
| Net Income Growth | 21.1% | 0.0% |
| EPS Growth | 15.8% | -21.4% |
ATO vs LNG: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, ATO or LNG?
LNG is 1.9 times larger than ATO by market capitalization ($57.09B against $29.57B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, ATO or LNG?
LNG trades at 19.9 times trailing earnings, ATO at 20.9 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, ATO or LNG?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.