ALAB vs MCHP: stock comparison and AI forecast
Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Microchip Technology Inc (MCHP) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $31.14B
- P/E Ratio
- 70.7x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
MCHP Microchip Technology Inc
- Market Cap
- $35.21B
- P/E Ratio
- 74.5x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- MCHP is 1.1 times larger than ALAB by market capitalization ($35.21B against $31.14B).
- ALAB trades at 70.7 times trailing earnings, MCHP at 74.5 times.
- MCHP carries 1.21 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.15 times for ALAB.
- MCHP yields 2.80% in dividends; ALAB pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Semiconductors & Related Devices.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | ALAB | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $31.14B | $35.21B |
| P/E Ratio | 70.66x | 74.54x |
| P/B Ratio | 15.57x | 5.30x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 2.80% |
| EPS | $2.54 | $0.87 |
| Book Value/Share | $11.53 | $12.23 |
| Revenue/Share | $8.97 | $10.32 |
| FCF/Share | $1.99 | $2.68 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | ALAB | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 23.1% | – |
| ROA | 20.1% | – |
| ROIC | 19.3% | 8.7% |
| Gross Margin | 73.9% | 62.7% |
| Operating Margin | 25.5% | 20.9% |
| Net Margin | 29.6% | – |
| EBT Margin | 28.7% | 17.2% |
| Tax Rate | -3.2% | 13.1% |
Financial Health
| Metric | ALAB | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 8.03x | 2.24x |
| Quick Ratio | 7.20x | 1.33x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.15x | 1.21x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.15x | 2.21x |
| Interest Coverage | – | 1.0x |
| Working Capital | $1.71B | $1.52B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | ALAB | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $437M | $1.53B |
| Free Cash Flow | $345M | $1.46B |
| Capital Spending | -$92M | -$74M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 65.6% | 81.8% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 50.2% | 92.9% |
| FCF/Sales | 22.1% | 26.0% |
| CapEx/Sales | 5.9% | 1.3% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | ALAB | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.68x | 0.38x |
| Receivables Turnover | 5.5x | 5.8x |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.0x | 1.9x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 9.1x | 5.2x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 67 days | 63 days |
| Days Inventory | 180 days | 195 days |
| Payables Period | 87 days | 46 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 160 days | 212 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | ALAB | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $1.56B | $5.60B |
| Operating Income | $397M | $1.17B |
| Net Income | $461M | – |
| R&D Expense | $526M | $1.20B |
| SG&A Expense | $357M | $714M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $406M | $2.09B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | ALAB | MCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $1.82 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 209.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | 173M | 543M |
| Net Income Growth | 132.0% | – |
ALAB vs MCHP: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, ALAB or MCHP?
MCHP is 1.1 times larger than ALAB by market capitalization ($35.21B against $31.14B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, ALAB or MCHP?
ALAB trades at 70.7 times trailing earnings, MCHP at 74.5 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, ALAB or MCHP?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.