AIP vs AOSL: stock comparison and AI forecast
Arteris, Inc. (AIP) and Alpha & Omega Semiconductor Ltd (AOSL) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
AIP Arteris, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $783M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
AOSL Alpha & Omega Semiconductor Ltd
- Market Cap
- $559M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- AIP is 1.4 times larger than AOSL by market capitalization ($783M against $559M).
- AOSL turns -6.2% of its revenue into net income, against -44.8% for AIP.
- AIP carries 2.46 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.21 times for AOSL.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Semiconductors & Related Devices.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | AIP | AOSL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $783M | $559M |
| P/B Ratio | 11.89x | 0.70x |
| EPS | $-0.84 | $-1.41 |
| Book Value/Share | $1.34 | $26.37 |
| Revenue/Share | $1.89 | $22.44 |
| FCF/Share | $0.04 | $-2.25 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | AIP | AOSL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -63.3% | -5.3% |
| ROA | -18.3% | -4.4% |
| ROIC | -33.5% | -5.2% |
| Gross Margin | 86.9% | 22.3% |
| Operating Margin | -46.2% | -6.4% |
| Net Margin | -44.8% | -6.2% |
| EBT Margin | -47.2% | -5.2% |
| Tax Rate | 5.0% | -21.0% |
Financial Health
| Metric | AIP | AOSL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.35x | 3.44x |
| Quick Ratio | – | 1.86x |
| D/E Ratio | 2.46x | 0.21x |
| Financial Leverage | 3.46x | 1.21x |
| Interest Coverage | -82.5x | -2.8x |
| Working Capital | $34M | $311M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | AIP | AOSL |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $4M | -$16M |
| Free Cash Flow | $2M | -$68M |
| Capital Spending | -$1M | -$52M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 282.7% | -155.0% |
| FCF/Sales | 2.3% | -10.0% |
| CapEx/Sales | 1.5% | 7.6% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | AIP | AOSL |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.41x | 0.70x |
| Receivables Turnover | 4.4x | 15.9x |
| Inventory Turnover | – | 2.6x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 13.4x | 2.2x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 82 days | 23 days |
| Days Inventory | – | 139 days |
| Payables Period | 45 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | AIP | AOSL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $93M | $679M |
| Operating Income | -$43M | -$43M |
| Net Income | -$42M | -$42M |
| R&D Expense | $61M | $104M |
| SG&A Expense | $116M | $91M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $12M | $527M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | AIP | AOSL |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 49M | 30M |
AIP vs AOSL: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, AIP or AOSL?
AIP is 1.4 times larger than AOSL by market capitalization ($783M against $559M).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, AIP or AOSL?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.